In one line
Sometimes a paid ad simply takes traffic that would have arrived organically for free. That is cannibalization, and it shows up most on ads aimed at people who already know you — brand search, retargeting.
Why it's risky
Performance reports credit every conversion to the ad that touched it last. If some of those users would have converted organically regardless, not subtracting that share makes ad efficiency look better than it really is.
How to confirm it
Observation alone can't prove cannibalization exists. A holdout test — randomly turning the ad off for part of your audience and comparing total conversions — is the real way to confirm it.
Cannibalization rate = organic conversions gained after pausing ÷ paid conversions lost
If paid conversions fall by 100 while organic rises by 70, the observed cannibalization rate is 70% and the remaining net increment is 30 conversions. Without random assignment or a comparable control, treat that rate as a diagnostic signal rather than a causal estimate.
| Observation | What it may mean | Decision use |
|---|---|---|
| Paid falls while total stays flat | Organic substitution is plausible | Pause scaling and design a holdout |
| Total conversions also fall | Some net increment may exist | Recalculate incremental CPA or ROAS |
| Interval crosses zero | Current data cannot distinguish the effect | Do not translate it as no effect |
Go deeper
Signals that suggest cannibalization, and how to confirm it, are covered in Diagnosing Cannibalization.